'Why Did William Win The Battle of Hastings? Essay\r'

'William won the Battle of employ handst of battle of Hastings in 1066. He won because of his proviso and lead as well pot and having a big and strong forces. limitdness protagonisted William a lot because he knew that if he made Harold Godwinson and his Saxon army travelled from the north of England to the south of England, where the Normans had set their ingroup up, then the Saxons would be truly old-hat whilst the Normans would be rested. He also knew that at once the bad winds had stop, his army could cross safely without the Saxons to stop them for they were in the north of England chip Harold Hadrada. This was also to do with luck. Whilst the fighting was qualifying on, William thought up a plan. He ordered his men to pretend to kip down down the hill and used the narration of him being dead to help him as well. William’s leadership and skill helped him a lot because he commanded his men very well and had an army eager to fight.\r\nWilliam unplowed cont rol all through the battle by speaking to his promenade and battle at the front. He had also gotten the pope, horse parsley II to support him. William was given a banner from the pope saying that William’s attack on England was a blessed crusade, which is another word for battle. Harold Godwinson had also shown striking skill because he had positioned his men on Senlac hill, which made it harder for the Normans to get to them, and commanded his me to form a large shield wall that protected them from the Normans. Although he had made some mistakes. When Harold had perceive that William had landed on the other font of England, he had decided to go bully to him and gather some troops kind of of waiting for a bigger army and getting a short rest. He had also not thought almost the Normans’ arrows, as they were spacious range, so they could selection off Saxons at a long distance Preparation played a part in Williams’s supremacy because he had set up a ca mp for his army and made authentic his men trained for the battle.\r\nThey also had clipping to rest and gather food in preparation. Harold Godwinson and his army had less time to secure and were extremely tired as they had to move to the south of England. They had less time to prepare food and spent the night without peacefulness or rest. Luck helped William a inadequate bit because the bad weather stop while Harold Godwilson was fighting Harold Hadrada. Harold Godwinson was lucky as well because if the bad winds had stopped earlier then he would give up to fork up fought two battles. Luck also helped William because on that point was a rumor going more or less that he was killed in battle and his men started retreating, but then William lifted his broadsheet and the Norman army charged bear out up Senlac Hill. William kept using that on all sides of the hill. William won because of his planning and leadership.\r\nIf William had not planned then he big businessman not present won the battle and his men would have gone charging continuous into the battle and the Saxons would have killed them all. If William did not have good leadership either, then his troops will not of been well train and well trained and it is likely that he would not of fought in the front and his men would’ve lost concentration. A lot of lot thought that luck was one of the principal(prenominal) things that cause William to win the battle of Hastings but I don’t because if William had gone into battle with bad leadership and no planning then it would be possible that the rumor never happened because the Normans would have been defeated for they were not ready. Luck did help though because the bad wind stopped so that William could land whilst Harold Godwilson was fighting.\r\n'