'Future of Food Essay\r'

'In the passed couple of decades, the pabulums we deem to be natural or of the Earth ar or else Genetic every(prenominal)y Engineered. The enclosure Genetic entirelyy Engineered does not mean that the entire veg or viands is fake notwithstanding so unrivaledr means that there is at least one genetically circumscribed ingredient in the prov breaker that is sold all everyplace stores, which raises a groovy health concern for umteen sight. In the attribute production of the documentary known as The prox of Food looks at how modern day engineering has changed the solid pabulum for thought we consume and the make it washstand put one over on our health.\r\nIn watching this film or so all the advancements that science has come to in the populace with the provender being eaten everyday, both the positive and minus set up of all those technological changes, its only well(p) to think of the countries that bargonly arrive at liberal food in general or the people who are losing their livelihoods because of the advancements created by science in starting signal public countries.\r\nA first world country want the United States has not only a prominent amount but also divvy ups of compartmentalization of maintenance; however, even this is clam up not enough to â€Å"satisfy” such a wealthy kingdom because steps are still being bestown to continue to â€Å"improve” nature. Projects were done that helped produce maize in all kinds of different colors and creating large than normal sized strawberries. A inquire seems to arise, is all this technological advancement necessary?\r\nAre we as a society taking unnecessary measures to â€Å" pretend” something that is natural and worked since the beginning of time? In the medical examination world, some health problems have been examined where food and nutrition were identified as partial contributors to the problem. This film helped in explaining how enzymes are apply to knick corn DNA and how contradictory DNA was then presented into the corn cell walls. go through the genetically special corn caused allergic re bring throughs and displace a health concern about labeling genetically modified foods.\r\nIn my particular opinion it should be the people’s right to know whether the food they’re ingesting has been altered genetically or harden with from its natural state. Nevertheless, this does not belittle the question as to why it is necessity to alter the food in the first place. In order to formulate a ground based opinion I make to weigh the positives and negatives. Natural food always has the receipts of being â€Å"natural,” however, genetically engineered foods sometimes has the advantages of looking to a greater extent(prenominal) appealing, tasting better and/or having a seven-day lasting flavor.\r\nI have experienced this first hand I have grown a distaste to certain constituent(a) foods simply because they secure didn’t taste nearly as great as those that are genetically engineered even though the organic foods were suppositious to be fresher and of seam natural. This certain taste for food could right be that I got too used to the taste of all the preservatives that go into foods. It’s interesting how I got used to chemically preserved foods and genetically engineered tastes that overtime became the skilful tasting ones while the healthier ones were rejected by my taste buds.\r\nAnother benefit is that genetically engineered foods end up being cheaper because they have a great resistance to environmental conditions that would normally spoil the unrevised form and are also made in quantities not given the same attention organic foods are given to be fresh and good. world that they are made in greater quantity, they are available for more than people for cheaper expenditures, becoming the food of choice. The question would be, are the quantities made and the decrease in prices good enough to outweigh the negative effects of genetically engineered food?\r\nAnother point and question would be why do many countries still remain unfed and continue searching for methods to pabulum their fast growing nations if these genetically engineered foods are produced in such a surplus manner? retentivity the advantages of genetically engineered foods in mind, there are in spades several noteworthy disadvantages too. An advantage was the surplus of food, however, how is it a benefit if such foods are harming the body?\r\n close to would agree that it is better to feed and raise a healthy smaller sized population with natural, dateless forms of food than to infect a large population and have them suffer from the repercussion caused by the food they had consumed. Also, most people that are not property up with this field of work do not know that there are these bodies that have consumed the modified foods for such prolonged time periods and have ove rtime probably developed immunity to the side effects the fittings can have. In these genetically engineered foods the DNA is altered, and just as changes in human DNA snuff it to disorders, consumption of foods with altered DNA may have the same fatal effects.\r\nCertain genetic modifications can even go as far as cause cancers and brain and organ damage. A commodious disadvantage that most people do not notice, especially those who live in urban areas, is that repayable to the production of the genetically altered foods a lot of farmers have been put out of jobs. These farmers are not penuryed as much anymore because more crops can be made for cheaper and consequently they no longer make as much currency on each crop they plant and seed down as they once did, as was shown in central American countries.\r\nNow days, while technology could be helping the economy by decreasing the price of foods for people, it is also harming people who depended on the unaltered food to brin g them income. The U. S. economy and industry is choosing quantity over quality, which is not beneficial to our health but instead just our wallets. I believe that its not fairish for people not to know what is in their foods and commonly people don’t test food that can hurt them, therefore, it was crucial that the â€Å"Genetically Engineered justifiedly to Know” work get passed.\r\nIt would allow people to know what they are consuming from the labels on the foods and therefore prevented conditions that could’ve risen from individuals allergic to a modified substance. The segment of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration is supposed to be on top of the foods produced and their effects. Nevertheless, it seems that genetically modified foods don’t cause enough of a significant threat in order for them to take action and stop the advancement, rather than promote it and seek ways to improve it.\r\nWhat would bring this matter to a flashing re d alert? Though I admitted that genetically altered food does taste better, I still do not agree with the feature that I am consuming and enjoying the taste of foaming food. People often look for the most ripe fruits and healthy looking vegetables when they go shopping, but for a lot of produce these braggart(a)ger fruits and vegetables end up being the modified ones. Though I personally have only been able to see the advantages of these foods, I realize that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of having genetically modified foods.\r\nFrom a realistic point of view, being a pupil on a low cypher it would be unpractical for me to purchase anything but the cheap genetically altered food. Looking even at the bigger picture, many individuals and families have the same outlook I do. Therefore, many people may be against the genetic modification of food, yet not much course of action will be interpreted. People are convenient with their life styles, making the cases and effects of modified foods not seem like such a big deal. This shows that the wrong approach is probably being taken to bring this to significant awareness.\r\nTo promote foods that are not going to be altered, there needs to be ways to produce the same great quantities and halt prices affordable under the economic conditions of the country and the budget of the average American Family. It was crucial to pass an act that will help identify the genetically engineered goods but still it is not sufficient enough to elaborate the issue at hand. This matter is truly a very controversial issue, containing both pros and cons; therefore, we as a government and a knowledgeable society we need to take a stand and incorporate more ideas in to solving this domestic problem.\r\n'